Is Europe Redeemable?
Within Cesaire’s discourse on colonialism, Cesaire argues
that though civilizational contact and exchange is like oxygen and prevents
cultural atrophy, colonization finds itself infinitely distanced from any
notion of civilization since you cannot find within it a single human value. I
argue that due to the continuity of the tradition of hypocrisy, rationalization of
oppression, and thingification in Europe, both in the lead up to and in the
aftermath of the Holocaust, that Europe is beyond redemption. Europe's regression in other words continues undisturbed, preventing any moment where Europe actively addresses the violence and hypocrisy that dominates its conscious.
We begin with the “universal regression” that Cesaire cites
which occurs at every instance of colonial violence and which guides Europe
towards savagery. This savagery finds its apotheosis in the Holocaust which is clearest
manifestation of a boomerang effect wherein the former accomplices of Nazism
are transformed for the first time into its principal victims. Moreover,
Cesaire states that the morbidity of the violence in the colonies simply proves
that colonial activity, predicated upon a contempt for and dehumanization of
the native has dehumanized the colonizer himself. It is the colonizer who has
rendered himself an animal.
From this dehumanized state, the Holocaust confronts the tradition
of European humanism and reveals the hypocrisy I mentioned earlier. To exemplify
the Hitler that resides within the consciousness of bourgeois consciousness, Cesaire cites the idealist philosopher Renan who
stated that the “inequalities among men (must be made) into a law’’ in the
country of a “foreign race” so as to ensure domination. Renan is cited again in
a reference to how the regeneration of degenerate races by the superior races
is a providential order. Beyond philosophers, we see references to Christian
Reverends Muller and Barde who both discuss how without colonization the Earth’s
resources left to the uncivilized peoples will go to waste. Cesaire here
establishes a firm ideological substructure from which Hitler emerges and from
which he does not have to deviate at all. Cesaire here has illustrated that a civilization
which justifies colonization is one that is sick and bound to Hitlerism inextricably.
But it is after the Holocaust that we see no significant change in European
consciousness and that despite the boomerang effect having wreaked havoc,
Europe remains content with defending the contradictions in its humanism and rationality.
To this end, Cesaire cites French politicians Coste-Floret and Bidault who
oversee the mass slaughter in Madagascar during the uprisings in the region in
a time where there are calls for a return to Christian virtues.
For Cesaire, the petty bourgeois, whose thoughts are
represented by the words of Jules Romains who stated that civilization has only
been made by the white race or George Lapouge who stated that slavery is like
the domestication of a horse, filters reality in such a way that it eliminates or
“flicks away” the realities of the cultures that were exterminated by European
presence. I argue, keeping the violence that was perpetuated in Madagascar in
1947 in mind, that this colonial epistemology is never addressed by Europe and remains a key ally of the
violence that continues in the colonies which demonstrates my aforementioned
point that the tradition of violence and hypocrisy remains undisturbed by the image
of itself that the Holocaust forces Europe to confront. In fact, 5 years after
the defeat of Hitler, Cesaire cites that the European bourgeoise popularized
the idea that the infusion of foreign blood into the equilibrium of French
civilization is to blame for France’s current troubles. The colonized people
remained for Europe the canvas upon which they would project their shortcomings
and so racialist philosophy continued to be a crutch for European legitimacy.
Cesaire himself summarizes my central thesis best when he says that the
historical punishment of Europe is “to be condemned…to chew over Hitler's
vomit.”
We are left with a Europe that becomes consumed by the contradictions
and hypocrisies that plague its humanism, a humanism that when used to justify
the violence in the colonies renders Europe increasingly barbaric. Despite the
ultimate manifestation of the boomerang effect with the Holocaust, Europe
remains tied to its plagued philosophies of humanism and rationality as its
sole means sustaining its reality and its recognition of itself. In conclusion,
Europe never embraced, revisited, and truly resolved what the hypocrisies of
racialism that plagued its conscious which is why the racialist and outdated ideas
of Levy-Bruhl are successfully revived by Roger Callois as Cesaire points out. Thus
Europe can never be redeemed for what it never truly admitted.
Comments