Words, Maybe Too Many
The Black Radical Tradition to me has been the entirety of
this course. Starting from writers like Aime Cesaire to ending with Toni
Morrison, they have all dared to think differently. They have all dreamed of
what has maybe been dreamt multiple times, but has never been recognized as
something worthy. For this blog, I will narrow down on three writers (although all
of them deserve praise): Saidiya Hartman, Frantz Fanon and a short note on
Malcolm X. I hope this final blog is able to in some way convey the gratitude I
feel for having learned through so many wonderful thinkers. Maybe my words
cannot and maybe never will do justice to this thankfulness. Nonetheless, here
is an attempt.
In Lose Your Mother, I was exposed to a method of
history writing completely new and fascinating. It was a radical way to recall
the past, long for the past and to understand it as a concept. Of wanting to
know her ancestry Hartman writes that she has seen this “ache in others too.” This
is perhaps true of all of us, that we all have a “hunger for the past”. This is
why I often find myself rummaging through old family photographs. All of these
tend to be from my mother’s side. I think I only once chanced upon a picture of
my paternal family. I draw a lot of my features from them. This history has
always been painful to ask my father about (perhaps because it is marred by so
many losses) and so I know it only in “fragments of stories and names.” I do not
mean to equate my own life to Hartman’s, it is just that reading her returned
me to many of my own sentiments. Moving on, there is a kind of attachment and
detachment that I see in her writing too. In one way Hartman sees that she has “yet
to make a home”. She understands that she does not always have to “return” and
that “there is no going back to a former condition”. This confession has stayed
with me. It is a strength, and one I have seen in other writers too, that allows
them to imagine a future full of “alternate presents”. There are indeed things
we have “never enjoyed” because of the shapes our pasts have settled into. But
this truth only “inaugurates” our existence.
“I will impose my whole weight as a
man…”
When I read the conclusion to Frantz
Fanon’s Black Skin, White Masks, this particular sentence made me deeply
emotional. I don’t know what it was. Perhaps reading it helped me to feel my
own weight as a person. For what could have been the first time, the rootedness
of my own being became clear. I had never felt my presence as easily as I had
then. When thinking about the concept of negritude Fanon emphasizes that he is
not a “prisoner of history”. The “eternal brilliance of the world” for him lies
in “the open door of every consciousness”. That is, he believes in giving a space
to new ways of thinking and of being, based on ones “own foundation.” It is natural
to yearn for the knowledge of where we have come from, but it should not
consume us so that we only see ourselves in longing. Fanon bravely rejects this
kind of person-hood. He wants to be known as himself. Nothing more, and nothing
less. He wants to be able to claim his actions as his own choices, undetermined
by any other story. This too, is a radical way to look on at life. The
tragedies of the past can be remembered with grief, but they should not lead to a faithlessness. They mold us in one way or another, yet, they
must not shackle us so that the future seems pointless.
Finally, Malcolm X. Much can be said
about him. His influence on liberation movements, ideas of unity, freedom and love has been immense. But it has been Malcolm’s unending quest to be better that has
stuck with me. This is perhaps one promise life never breaks: to improve and to
rework what we know. “Radical alteration” signifies Malcolm X to me. In a society
where people are often cast away and “cancelled”, his message reminds me that
human beings are not rigid entities. We are capable of changing, of learning
and in turn also growing. This is what all these thinkers too, have written
about. It is most interesting to realize how connected all of them are. As we pointed out in class: when
simplified, the messages have been the same. Only the experiences from which
they have come seem to have varied. Perhaps I too can then live in a way that
is inspired by them. This is the generosity of the tradition. It lends itself as a friend, open to conversation so that we end up finding parts of ourselves along the way.
Comments