Blog 1 - Cultural Death
The Apotheosis of
Captain Cook, is, in some ways an attempt by Gananath Obeyesekere to
deconstruct the myth of the benevolent explorer – in this case Captain James
Cook who led three remarkable voyages into the Pacific Ocean and leading the
Europeans into Australia and New Zealand, beginning with his landing on the
shores of Hawaii. The popular understanding of Cook today is a largely positive
one – he is said to have “exemplified the new spirit of discovery” that served
as a peaceful amalgamation of “science and exploration – a true representative
of the Enlightenment.” Part of the Apotheosis revolves around breaking down the
untouchable persona of the peaceful navigator. Obeyesekere identifies the
hidden violence that characterized Cook’s voyages and his behavior towards the
natives he encountered: “any resistance cannot (could not) be tolerated.”
The truly sinister
reading of the text however, takes form through Obeyesekere’s conceptualization
of ‘myth models’ that serve as the basis for the construction of myths, or a
set of ideas that give rise to various narratives. Obeyesekere claims that the
popular understanding of Cook as the ideal navigator, the harbinger of
civilization is also a Western myth, thus contesting the belief that myths have
little to do with the European intellectual tradition, and are purely a remnant
of “pre-modern or uncivilized” societies that heroes such as Cook, Columbus and
Cook encountered on their expeditions. This
is where the crux of the argument takes shape and ties into the titled
apotheosis, or the belief of the Polynesian natives that Cook was a
manifestation of their God – Lono.
Obeyesekere is
attempting to shed light on a certain kind of subdued violence that is very
much a significant part of the colonial legacy, the kind of violence that
cannot be expressed as a statistic of the number of native lives lost. This
subtle form of violence is far more deadly and elusive for the way it has
seeped into the general consciousness. Even esteemed scholars such as Marshall
Sahlins find it difficult, if not impossible to detach from the popularized notions
of feeling and logic, of faith and science, of the savage and the civilized and
of the colonized and the colonizer. This is the epistemic violence that pits
worldviews against each other and finds favour in the European model of logic,
thought, science and reasoning over the native’s ‘prelogical’ world governed by
signs and myth. Obeyesekere argues that these perceptions of native populations
and European colonizers have become so deeply entrenched that even otherwise well
meaning and educated scholarship draws on these pre-determined conclusions.
Obeyesekere cites Todorov and finds that while the latter was excessively
sympathetic to the plight of the Aztecs, he still fell victim to that
established idea that “Indians are bound by signs; consequently they can be
easily subjugated by the Spanish who have mastery over signs.”
This manipulation
characterizes the apotheosis of Captain Cook. He claims to be received as a God
by the natives he encounters, as they prostrate before him in awe on the shores
of Hawaii. Eerily similar accounts exist for the landing of Columbus and
Cortes. These accounts are never questioned, and, as demonstrated above, have
been firmly embedded into the general and academic consciousness. While
seemingly harmless, they serve a sinister purpose; to denigrate the natives as
people dependent upon signs and emotions and feelings, while their European
‘superiors’ are those who lead by logic, rationality and reasoning. To simply
ascribe these worldviews is not problematic in itself – it is in fact the
follow up conclusion that derides the former and elevates the higher – mythos
is inferior, and thus, the natives, privy to such fickle and nonsensical
beliefs are inferior people. Logos is superior, and the Europeans, by
consequence are a superior people. This hierarchy serves as the basis for the
cultural domination – and cultural death of native peoples that characterized
European colonialism. It is also the grounds for the massive physical, cultural
and psychological devastation that was wrought upon native populations in the
name of science and technology as the ultimate justification.
Comments