Cultural Death - The Apotheosis of Captain Cook
In the Apotheosis of
Captain Cook, Obeyesekere, writes about the different forms of punishments that
Cook levied upon the indigenous people that he encountered. He writes about how
this act of punishing achieved two things: firstly it imposed British judicial
norms upon the Polynesians and secondly expressed the British view that the
Polynesians, including their chiefs were subordinate to the authority of the
captain, in this case Cook. In my opinion, these punishments are useful for
understanding the larger process of cultural death brought on colonialism.
It can be argued that
these punishments, ranging from lashings to shootings to having a cross carved
onto one’s body by a knife, all arise from a specific culture. In the case of
lashings, it was the British Admiralty that deemed them to be an appropriate
punishment to use for the crew – a principle that Cook later extended to the
Polynesians – as well as the number of lashings that a person could receive.
The far more extreme punishment of carving a cross onto the body of a
Polynesian, which Cook had done to a native caught thieving, while not specified
under any rule of the British Admiralty, still originates from with the Christian
British culture where the cross had a great symbolic value.
It can also be argued
that the Polynesian punishments for similar crimes might have been completely
different and as such it can be argued that the crimes for which Cook had
natives shot, lashed or carved, received completely different responses from
their own local cultures. Due to Cook’s actions the British sense of what
punishment was appropriate, as well as the form of the punishment dominated what the Polynesians might have thought was appropriate. These punishments
then become significant in that they represent the domination of the British
cultural understanding of justice and punishment over that of the Polynesians.
The fact that Cook gave
out these punishments to Polynesian Chiefs is also significant. By having
Chiefs also lashed and punished, in front of their people, Cook expresses the
view that the local hierarchies and cultural patterns of societal organization
do not hold any value in comparison to that of the British. Obeyesekere writes
about how while the Chiefs were seen to be of a higher rank than the crew
members of Cook’s ships, they were still seen to be below Cook and his officers
and were as such subject to the same system of punishments as the crew. This
very clearly represents the hierarchy in which the colonizers placed themselves
and their own culture. No matter the place the Chiefs occupied within the local
society and culture, they would still be punished like any other British crew
member – even if their local position effectively meant that they would have
always evaded punishment within their local society. This essentially means
that all local hierarchies and power structures, all deriving from a particular
culture, held little to no value for the British. Consequently the culture
itself was disregarded when it opposed that of the British.
These processes, as
demonstrated by Cook’s punishments, when expanded would result in cultural death
and domination as all those elements not in line with British sensibilities would
simple be disregarded and abolished.
Comments